Your unvalidated experience in courtrooms and my unvalidated experience is irrelevant.
RE
In other words, you've got none, and don't want to get into another round of it turning out that when I say something, like mentioning my scientific career, and you then validating it, that I might do the same with my experience in courtrooms, and demonstrate yet again that I really do the tell the truth, as much as it irritates you?
As you well know, Appeal to Authority is not a valid argument, besides which the assumption you make isn't true either.
I didn't appeal to authority, I stated a fact, and YOU validated it in your tracking of my person and finding out my professional background, and began passing around my work to the moderators at the Diner so that everyone could see for themselves my qualifications.
That is all true, and you were involved, participated in it, and yourself proclaimed the great discovery right there on the Diner. College I went to, pictures of me, Dave was calling me by name every chance he got.
I simply refer to history. And the facts as stated by you, and Dave, and those articles you passed around, and how you claimed you tracked and found me.
Nobody here cares if you think you are an expert on something.
Doesn't matter what I think.
Isn't world renowned a little farther up the food chain than just run of the mill expert? We're all experts on something. We all just argue our opinion and post up stiff that backs up those opinions.
RE
Well, I'll give you that we all say stuff. And most of that stuff is certainly opinion. And just like the opinion at a cocktail party, has no requirement to be correct, factual or realistic. Certainly COULD be all of those things as well, but is that what we do at cocktail parties, stick with the dry and professional dick measuring, as opposed to opinions of a more interesting nature, to go with the booze? Not sure any level of expertise on any topic has anything to do with it.