61
General Discussion / Re: Energy Errata
« Last post by FarmGirl on March 24, 2023, 06:20:21 pm »I'm not the one insisting that a one word incantation wards off all inconvenient fact.
Neither am I. Try not to characterize so far outside of the boundaries that I am obviously drawing with thorough explanations. If you don't like the boundaries I've defined, feel free to offer your own.
Quote from: Phil Potts
I'm also not the one insisting we must be like an animal capable of only recognising that another animal is dead, but not thinking it is going to die itself (constant expressions of wonderment and awe at low EROEI seeing out the boomer generation with a market economy, notwithstanding).
I also made no comparisons to any other species. You wish to do so, fine, then define what you even mean, non-humans being in awe of low eroei or market economies. Certainly I didn't mention much about those topics either in my definition.
Quote from: Phil Potts
The difference between myself and most others of my cohort is that I notice a lot more changes and trends, make more associations and reflect much more on a systematic theory of everything.
Outstanding. And you are presuming that all us other older farts don't do the same? Just because I like a simple metric doesn't mean it doesn't start off with exactly the kind of changes and trends analysis that you reflect on.
Quote from: Phil Potts
When I got in the car this afternoon, I caught some interview about tattoo removal and the interviewer saying he got his first tattoo at 48. He said it was because it really meant something to him. To me this is simply another quintessential example of controlled civilizational collapse in action.
There is nothing wrong with you defining collapse as middle aged people getting tattoos. In my opinion, it cheapens the use of the word among those of us who have been paying attention to the topic, and usually discussing what I will call REAL collapse, as middle aged folks getting tattooes wasn't much of a hot topic at the old Diner, and this is possibly the first time I've heard someone want to use it as an indicator.
Quote from: Phil Potts
If you want to say we have had our lifetimes, then you must say also we have had our civilization.
Now THIS strikes me as an honest thought on what I've been saying. It seems reasonable the more I think of it, so I will agree with you. Us old farts have had our lifetimes, and lived in our civilization. Based on my familiariity with newer folks, I can't say I like what they are deciding to create for their civilization any more than I like tattoos, or they like my opinion on certain topics and then call me "boomer".
Quote from: Phil Potts
Losing 25% of population a year results in complete extinction in 4 yrs. Apparently we would still have access to nternet to only comment on real collapse and not say anything unsettling.
25% year over reductions don't involve the same number each year. 25% reduction in the first year of 8 billion in population is 2 billion, leaving 6 billion remaining. 25% of 6 billion is 1.5 billion dead, 4.5 billion remaining. Another 25% reduction in 4.5? 1.125 down to 3.375. Next is 0.84 billion dead, and a final total of 2.5 billion, give or take. Etc etc.
Quote from: Phil Potts
The UK has just approved supplying depleted uranium ammunition for use in ukr. This not only responsible for the Gulf War Syndrome, but poisons ground so food supply from a major world source is ruined. See no evil, hear no evil.
I imagine if people in the UK care there will be riots in the streets, recalls on all politicians, calls for defunding the military or government. If they aren't, well, the world is a different type society from the one us old farts had, isn't it?
Recent Posts